pseudonymity
Aug. 23rd, 2013 02:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...and, once again, someone out there in the blogosphere is declaring that using a pseudonym is "cowardly" and means you have issues.
*rolls eyes to infinity*
Dear Universe,
Should I behave like an arse in internetville, you may want to publish my name far and wide to shame me into submission. If this happens, you'll basically have one of three options, depending on which name you've got hold of.
1) My professional name.
Googling my professional name will uncover my Linked In account, and very little else. At which point, you may be able to track down my past employers (good luck: I can't manage to track down most of them), and informed them in horrified tones that I have been misbehaving on the internet. To which they will respond: "...so?"
2) My legal name.
If you google my legal name, you will be directed to a franchise of beauty specialists in the USA. I won't come up at all.
If you happen to know a whole bunch of extra details about my life, you may be able to track down the real me. However:
a) the only way you could find out those details is by knowing my screenname and checking out this blog;
b) the only people you could contact after this detective work would be my family - who read my blog, and already know most of the ways I'm likely to misbehave on the internet.
3) My screenname.
This would be Deird, deird1, St Deird, or other variations thereof.
I use this name at: LiveJournal, Dreamwidth, Slacktivist, Love Joy Feminism, Rachel Held Evans, Ship of Fools, Snark Squad, Making Light, Tumblr, Ravelry, AO3, Whedonesque, Hoyden About Town, Vimeo, and everywhere Disqus is in operation. If you know my screenname, you have the power to ruin my life.
Cowardly? Cowardly would be hiding behind one of my RL names. Using my pseudonym puts my entire online reputation at risk – and that's the gutsy option.
*rolls eyes to infinity*
Dear Universe,
Should I behave like an arse in internetville, you may want to publish my name far and wide to shame me into submission. If this happens, you'll basically have one of three options, depending on which name you've got hold of.
1) My professional name.
Googling my professional name will uncover my Linked In account, and very little else. At which point, you may be able to track down my past employers (good luck: I can't manage to track down most of them), and informed them in horrified tones that I have been misbehaving on the internet. To which they will respond: "...so?"
2) My legal name.
If you google my legal name, you will be directed to a franchise of beauty specialists in the USA. I won't come up at all.
If you happen to know a whole bunch of extra details about my life, you may be able to track down the real me. However:
a) the only way you could find out those details is by knowing my screenname and checking out this blog;
b) the only people you could contact after this detective work would be my family - who read my blog, and already know most of the ways I'm likely to misbehave on the internet.
3) My screenname.
This would be Deird, deird1, St Deird, or other variations thereof.
I use this name at: LiveJournal, Dreamwidth, Slacktivist, Love Joy Feminism, Rachel Held Evans, Ship of Fools, Snark Squad, Making Light, Tumblr, Ravelry, AO3, Whedonesque, Hoyden About Town, Vimeo, and everywhere Disqus is in operation. If you know my screenname, you have the power to ruin my life.
Cowardly? Cowardly would be hiding behind one of my RL names. Using my pseudonym puts my entire online reputation at risk – and that's the gutsy option.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-23 05:47 am (UTC)Gabrielle
no subject
Date: 2013-08-23 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-23 04:04 pm (UTC)I think I'd have a bit more to lose if someone "outed" me, but then again I have an extremely common name, so I'd probably be fine. I do complain about work here sometimes, so that's my main concern. Though I also just prefer to keep my fannish life somewhat separate from my analogue life. AS IS MY RIGHT. :/
no subject
Date: 2013-08-23 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-23 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-25 11:30 pm (UTC)There are just so many reasons for people to use pseudonyms. And yet some people just act as though everyone who isn't using their legal name is commenting as a totally unidentifiable anonymous person, and is clearly doing so for nefarious purposes.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-24 01:41 am (UTC)Kerkevik was the name I adopted online; one that I created for an early attempt at world-building. Over time it has become more real as an identity than the one I was given.
Kerkevik is who I am; Ray Harley is who I am forced to be.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-25 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-02 11:16 pm (UTC)Btw I think you missed this.
http://kerk-e-fics.livejournal.com/1519.html
Lust Long and Perspire,
Ray.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-07 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-08-24 03:12 am (UTC)BTW, from now on, my headcanon is that your legal name is Vidal Sassoon or something.
I think "outing" someone (i.e. linking their real name to their screen name) can frequently be life-ruining, depending on the person's job and the nature of their online presence. But just, like, "So-and-so is a terrible person!" shaming? Yeah, it's much more effective to use the screen name since, presumably, the point is to ruin the person online.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-24 05:54 am (UTC)I'm guessing Sally Hansen. Though Vidal obviously has more pizazz.
no subject
Date: 2013-08-25 11:31 pm (UTC)Hee! Not quite. But maybe I should start claiming that it is…