an awesome film of a dreadful book
Feb. 8th, 2019 09:12 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Watched Disney's Tarzan (the one from the 90s). It was excellent.
Then googled the original book.
...I am never, ever touching the original book. It is horrifyingly racist.
I told my husband that the book was racist. He said "Yeah, probably", thinking I meant racist-because-it's-from-the-Victoria-era-so-of-course-it-is. I said "No, REALLY..." and explained that:
1) The book was about the nature/nurture debate.
2) The author deliberately took Tarzan away from his parents as a baby, so that "nurture" wouldn't apply.
3) The author deliberately made Tarzan an English noble because he "selected an infant child of a race strongly marked by hereditary characteristics of the finer and nobler sort". So that his "nature" would be as good as possible.
4) The point was to show how Tarzan would be superior to everyone because his nature was so wonderful, even though his nurture was horrible.
SO HORRIBLY, HORRIBLY RACIST, GUYS. Like, worse-than-Lovecraft racist. *boggles*
Then googled the original book.
...I am never, ever touching the original book. It is horrifyingly racist.
I told my husband that the book was racist. He said "Yeah, probably", thinking I meant racist-because-it's-from-the-Victoria-era-so-of-course-it-is. I said "No, REALLY..." and explained that:
1) The book was about the nature/nurture debate.
2) The author deliberately took Tarzan away from his parents as a baby, so that "nurture" wouldn't apply.
3) The author deliberately made Tarzan an English noble because he "selected an infant child of a race strongly marked by hereditary characteristics of the finer and nobler sort". So that his "nature" would be as good as possible.
4) The point was to show how Tarzan would be superior to everyone because his nature was so wonderful, even though his nurture was horrible.
SO HORRIBLY, HORRIBLY RACIST, GUYS. Like, worse-than-Lovecraft racist. *boggles*
no subject
Date: 2019-02-07 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-02-08 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-02-08 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-02-08 03:35 am (UTC)Mark Twain got in trouble for satirizing and commenting racism in the late 1800s and his books were banned by various "white Allegedly Christian" groups up until roughly the 1970s for the relationship between a black man and a white boy. Now they are banned by the opposite side -- which is hilarious.
Think about this for a minute..Gone with the Wind by Margret Mitchell was a best-selling novel in 1936, and it's even more racist. (They have the Klu Klux Klan in it -- and Scarlett, the heroine is aiding them.) The movie is actually toned down a bit from the book.
I've avoided anything by Edgar Rice Burroughs, my mother warned me off of them -- because her sister read them and she figured out how racist they were. Although I hear the Mars stuff isn't that bad. Actually, I avoid a lot of stuff from that time period.
no subject
Date: 2019-02-08 11:02 pm (UTC)